126 lines
7.5 KiB
Markdown
126 lines
7.5 KiB
Markdown
|
<!-- title: Running Prosody on Port 443 Behind traefik 2: Electric ALPN -->
|
||
|
<!-- description: In this blog post, I tell you how I changed my setup for proxying my XMPP server using traefik -->
|
||
|
<!-- render: yes -->
|
||
|
Hello everyone. Long time, no read.
|
||
|
|
||
|
In 2020, I published a post titled "[Running Prosody on Port 443 Behind traefik](https://blog.polynom.me/Running-Prosody-traefik.html)", where I described how I run my XMPP server
|
||
|
behind the "application proxy" [*traefik*](https://github.com/traefik/traefik).
|
||
|
I did this because I wanted to run my XMPP server *prosody* on port 443, so that the clients connected
|
||
|
to my server can bypass firewalls that only allow web traffic. While that approach worked,
|
||
|
over the last three years I changed my setup dramatically.
|
||
|
|
||
|
While migrating my old server from *Debian* to *NixOS*, I decided that I wanted a website
|
||
|
hosted at the same domain I host my XMPP server at. This, however, was not possible with
|
||
|
*traefik* back then because it only allowed the `HostSNI` rule, which differentiates TLS
|
||
|
connections using the sent *Server Name Indication*. This is a problem, because a connection
|
||
|
to `polynom.me` the website and `polynom.me` the XMPP server both result in the same SNI being
|
||
|
sent by a connecting client.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Some time later, I stumbled upon [*sslh*](https://github.com/yrutschle/sslh), which is a
|
||
|
tool similar to *traefik* in that it allows hosting multiple services on the same port, all
|
||
|
differentiated by the SNI **and** the ALPN set by the connecting client. ALPN, or *Application-Layer Protocol Negotiation*, is an extension
|
||
|
to TLS which allows a connecting client to advertise the protocol(s) it would like to use
|
||
|
inside the encrypted session [(source)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application-Layer_Protocol_Negotiation). As such, I put
|
||
|
*sslh* in front of my *traefik* and told it to route XMPP traffic (identified with an ALPN
|
||
|
of `xmpp-client`) to my prosody server and everything else to my *traefik* server. While this
|
||
|
worked well, there were two issues:
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. I was not running *sslh* in its ["transparent mode"](https://github.com/yrutschle/sslh/blob/master/doc/config.md#transparent-proxy-support), which uses some fancy iptable rules to allow the services behind it to see a connecting client's real IP address instead of just `127.0.0.1`. However, this requires more setup to work. This is an issue for services which enforce rate limits, like *NextCloud* and *Akkoma*. If one of theses services gets hit by many requests, all the services see are requests from `127.0.0.1` and may thus rate limit (or ban) `127.0.0.1`, meaning that all - even legitimate - requests are rate limited. Additionally, I was not sure if I could just use this to route an incoming IPv6 request to `127.0.0.1`, which is an IPv4 address.
|
||
|
2. One day, as I was updating my server, I noticed that all my web services were responding very slowly. After some looking around, it turned out that *sslh* took about 5 seconds to route IPv6 requests, but not IPv4 requests. As I did not change anything (besides update the server), to this day I am not sure what happened.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Due to these two issues, I decided to revisit the idea I described in my old post.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## The Prosody Setup
|
||
|
|
||
|
On the prosody-side of things, I did not change a lot compared to the old post. I did, however,
|
||
|
migrate from the `legacy_ssl_*` options to the newer `c2s_direct_tls_*` options, which
|
||
|
[replace the former](https://hg.prosody.im/trunk/file/tip/doc/doap.xml#l758).
|
||
|
|
||
|
Thus, my prosody configuration regarding direct TLS connections now looks like this:
|
||
|
|
||
|
```lua
|
||
|
c2s_direct_tls_ports = { 5223 }
|
||
|
c2s_direct_tls_ssl = {
|
||
|
[5223] = {
|
||
|
key = "/etc/prosody/certs/polynom.me.key";
|
||
|
certificate = "/etc/prosody/certs/polynom.me.crt";
|
||
|
};
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
## The *Traefik* Setup
|
||
|
|
||
|
On *traefik*-side of things, only one thing really changed: Instead of just having a rule using
|
||
|
`HostSNI`, I now also require that the connection with the XMPP server advertises an ALPN
|
||
|
of `xmpp-client`, which is specified in the
|
||
|
[appropriate XMPP spec](https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0368.html). From my deployment
|
||
|
experience, all clients I tested (*Conversations*, *Blabber*, *Gajim*, *Dino*, *Monal*, [Moxxy](https://moxxy.org))
|
||
|
correctly set the ALPN when connecting via a direct TLS connection.
|
||
|
|
||
|
So my *traefik* configuration now looks something like this (Not really, because I let NixOS
|
||
|
generate the actual config, but it is very similar):
|
||
|
|
||
|
```yaml
|
||
|
tcp:
|
||
|
routers:
|
||
|
xmpps:
|
||
|
entrypoints:
|
||
|
- "https"
|
||
|
rule: "HostSNI(`polynom.me`) && ALPN(`xmpp-client`)"
|
||
|
service: prosody
|
||
|
tls:
|
||
|
passthrough: true
|
||
|
# [...]
|
||
|
services:
|
||
|
prosody:
|
||
|
loadBalancer:
|
||
|
servers:
|
||
|
- address: "127.0.0.1:5223"
|
||
|
|
||
|
http:
|
||
|
routers:
|
||
|
web-secure:
|
||
|
entrypoints:
|
||
|
- "https"
|
||
|
rule: "Host(`polynom.me`)"
|
||
|
service: webserver
|
||
|
tls:
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
The entrypoint `https` is just set to listen on `:443`. This way, I can route IPv4 and IPv6
|
||
|
requests. Also note the `passthrough: true` in the XMPP router's `tls` settings. If this is
|
||
|
not set to `true`, then *traefik* would terminate the connection's TLS session before passing
|
||
|
the data to the XMPP server.
|
||
|
|
||
|
However, this config has one really big issue: In order
|
||
|
to have the website hosted at `polynom.me` be served using TLS, I have to set the
|
||
|
router's `tls` attribute. The *traefik*
|
||
|
documentation says that "*If both HTTP routers and TCP routers listen to the
|
||
|
same entry points, the TCP routers will apply before the HTTP routers. If no matching route
|
||
|
is found for the TCP routers, then the HTTP routers will take over.*"
|
||
|
[(source)](https://doc.traefik.io/traefik/routing/routers/#general_1).
|
||
|
|
||
|
This, however, does not seem to be the case if a HTTP router (in my example with ```Host(`polynom.me`)```) and a TCP router (in my example with ```HostSNI(`polynom.me`)```) respond to the same
|
||
|
SNI **and** the HTTP router has its `tls` attribute set. In that case, the HTTP router appears
|
||
|
to be checked first and will complain, if the sent ALPN is not one of the
|
||
|
[HTTP ALPNs](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Glossary/ALPN), for example when
|
||
|
connecting using XMPP. As such we can connect to the HTTP server but not to the
|
||
|
XMPP server.
|
||
|
|
||
|
It appears to be an issue that [I am not alone with](https://github.com/traefik/traefik/issues/9922), but also
|
||
|
one that is not fixed. So I tried digging around in *traefik*'s code and tried a couple of
|
||
|
things. So for my setup to work, I have to apply [this patch](https://github.com/PapaTutuWawa/traefik/commit/36f0e3c805ca4e645f3313f667a6b3ff5e2fe4a9) to *traefik*. With that, the issue *appears*
|
||
|
to be gone, and I can access both my website and my XMPP server on the same domain and on the
|
||
|
same port. Do note that this patch is not upstreamed and may break things. For me, it
|
||
|
works. But I haven't run extensive tests or *traefik*'s integration and unit tests.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Conclusion
|
||
|
|
||
|
This approach solves problem 2 fully and problem 1 partially. *Traefik* is able to route
|
||
|
the connections correctly with no delay, compared to *sslh*. It also provides my web services
|
||
|
with the connecting clients' IP addresses using HTTP headers. It does not, however, provide
|
||
|
my XMPP server with a connecting client's IP address. This could be solved with some clever
|
||
|
trickery, like telling *traefik* to use the [*PROXY* protocol](https://doc.traefik.io/traefik/routing/services/#proxy-protocol) when connecting to prosody,
|
||
|
and enabling the [`net_proxy`](https://modules.prosody.im/mod_net_proxy.html) module. However,
|
||
|
I have not yet tried such a setup, though I am very curious and may try that out.
|